Hi Henk,
Thanks for reply. We are now using WS54400001 and are maintaining Customer Code in Get_Agent, With this WF is triggering successfully. Issue is coming moment we put other fields, like Sales Org, here WF does not get trigger.
↧
Re: Customer User determination not working with GetAgent
↧
Re: Master data governance strategies before using MDG Tool
SAP MDM is well known master data tool. Many companies are also using IBM MDM, Informatica's MDM, Oracle's MDM tool....and lot of customized tools are available in market..
Kiran
↧
↧
Re: MDG Vendor Governance Approve Step
Hello Arturo,
Please make the STATUS for that step as NO processing allowed.
Thanks,
Kavita
↧
Re: Master data governance strategies before using MDG Tool
Hi Praveen,
As far as T-code, same old MASS transaction is available for doing larger master data maintenance.
↧
Issue in Calculated Expression
Hi Experts,
Need your quick help!
We are currently facing issue while updating field Days spent in MDM.
This is a calculated filed and the expression is as below
IF(IS_NULL(FIELD[FIELD[END_DATE_TIME]]),SYSTIME(0)[ ]-[ ]FIELD[FIELD[START_DATE_TIME]],FIELD[FIELD[END_DATE_TIME]]-FIELD[FIELD[START_DATE_TIME]])
Field Data Type
Start date Time GM Time
End Date Time GM Time
Days Spent Text
As per expression if a request is having end date then Days spent is End date time - start date time else
Days spent should be systime - start date time.
But currently in MDM if a request is not having any end date time it is updating days spent value with some garbage values like -8.171, -7.161,-5.555 etc which i wrong.
If i recalculate manually from data manager by selecting a record or if i am restarting repository days spent value is getting updated correctly.
This really looks weird for me. Can some one please help me with this issue.
Please check attached file for better understanding.
Regards,
Vamsi
↧
↧
Re: MDG Vendor Governance Approve Step
Hi Arturo,
In transaction MDGIMG, click on below link:
Choose the status which will be set after a Change Request is submitted and set it as "No Processing" like below and save it. With this assignment you cannot change objects of a change request on this status.
Thanks!
↧
Re: Customer User determination not working with GetAgent
Hi Vaibhav,
I don't know the specifics about the WS54400001 workflow. But these not Rule based workflows (for BP/Customer/Vendor) work in general like this:
Step 1 is done in the main workflow and is generic (so you can;t use any organization unit in agent determination like sales org or company code. So I'm sure why it is working in your first case will Company Code is filled with 0001.
Based on the org. units on you request sub. workflow are started for each unique org. value. So if you would have 2 CC and 2 SO. 4 Parallel branches are started. Each branch has a unique index (part of BUS2250 key). To get the parallel brances method CL_MDG_BS_CUST_WF_SERVICES-->READ_ENTITY_DATA is used (you can test to see what branches are created and how it is related to which org. unit).
MDG RBW Agent determination uses badi USMD_WF_AGENT. And the implementation for customer is MDG_BS_CUST_WF_AGENT_ERP. In this Badi implementation the index of the bus2250 key is used in combination with the same method CL_MDG_BS_CUST_WF_SERVICES-->READ_ENTITY_DATA to determine the relevant org. unit for this WF parallel branch. Then the agent is determined using the BRF table (so a combination of 2 org. units is not valid).
But to be sure how it exactly works it is best to debug the USMD_WF_AGENT implementation and see what parameters are put in the BRF+ context before the BRF+ function is called.
Problem is that the agent determination is already done in your WF. Put as long as WF is running you can simulate with testing class method cl_usmd_wf_ssw->find_path_processor.
Cheers,
Henk.
↧
Re: MDG C Enhance Address UI with new search criteria
Hi Ankur,
Sorry I have no document at hand about this topic.
Henk.
↧
Re: How to hide attributes for Mass change/File Upload in NWBC UI screen
Hi Bhupal,
Please check below BADI's for File upload:
- Enhancement Spot: USMD_DATA_TRANSFER
BAdI Definition: USMD_FILE_UPLOAD
Method: FILTER_ENTITY (Entity types could be filtered out )
- Enhancement Spot: USMD_DATA_TRANSFER_UPL
BAdI Definition: USMD_DATA_TRANSFER_UPL
Thanks!
↧
↧
MDG Base configuration
Hello Experts,
I have activated all switches fro MDG, still I am not able to see some predefined table filled like standard change request type,......
Do I need to activate BC set ? what are the BC set ? please share with sequence ? I am MDG_FND 747.
Regards,
RT
↧
Re: MDG Base configuration
Hi Rahul,
Take a look at the MDG Masterguide https://service.sap.com/~sapidb/012002523100008896162015E/MDGMasterGuideMDG80_SP00.pdf
Here you will find an overview of all MDG options, the concepts and also references to the correct config and installation guides.
Cheers,
Henk.
↧
Re: CR issue...
Finally CR appears but it gives me the below error. Pls help me to resolve it.
↧
Re: CR issue...
Hello,
There could be other reasons, however primary would be check you Authorizations If role is assigned with CR types and role is assigned to your User ID.
Also shown in the procedure shown in error msg, please check Link Logical Actions with Business activity & Link Log Actions with UI Applications and Bus Activity (Assuming your are using standard UI), where UI and its related Web Dypro screens are linked to Bus Activity, Also verify if Business activity is assigned to CR type.
BR
MSR
↧
↧
Re: MDG Base configuration
Hello,
A BC (Business Configuration) is a management tool that allows user to record, save and share customization settings. It can contain data from one or more IMG activities. When you activate this BC set in other system the values stored in BC sets are copied to corresponding customizing tables of the system.
In MDG, once BC sets are activated system copies all the standard configuration tasks in to MDG IMG activities (ex. CR types, Business Activities etc)
Please go through the link shared in above thread which gives out the which BC sets to be activated & contains details list of activities need to follow to configure system.
BR
MSR
↧
Re: How to hide attributes for Mass change/File Upload in NWBC UI screen
Hello,
Please navigate to UI configuration in MDG IMG
General Settings --> UI Modeling --> Define Field Properties for UI . For data model (MM) only specific fields are disabled for some of the processes.
It should help you to hide attributes for Mass Change UI Screens.
BR
MSR
↧
Re: MDG Customer idoc error
Hello Rama
I think you can search for SAP note. Can you explain what exactly you are trying to do?
Kiran
↧
Incomplete address; enter country (Message no. AM216) while creating a Business Partner Using T.Code: BP and While creating a Business partner using an Inbound IDOC
Hi,
When we are trying to create an Business Partner ID Using BP T.Code, system is showing an error Incomplete address; enter country (Message no. AM216).
Also, We are facing the same error while creating an BP Using an Inbound IDOC,
Basic Type: BUPA_INBOUND_MAIN_SAVE_M09
Message Type: BUPA_INBOUND_MAIN_SAVE_M
Note: Its working in Lower Client but not working in a new client which we created for Data Load.
Please Assist me in getting this issue resolved.
Regards,
Rajesh
↧
↧
How to hide UIBBs in MDG-M?
Hi everybody,
I'm searching for a way to hide UIBBs in MDG-M (dependent on change-request-data) without using the feeder class. more precisely: without using
enhancements of the standard code.
My approach was to replace the deposited web-dynpro-component /PLMU/WDC_FRW_APPL_CNTRL in the OVP-configuration with a copy
and try to use the assistance-class of this component. But the copied web-dynpro-component was not triggered by MDG.
Do you have any further ideas?
Thanks in advance
Hannes
↧
Re: How to hide UIBBs in MDG-M?
Hi Hannes,
You can use CBA for hiding UIBB .
Enhancing the MDG-M UI by using CBA | SCN
Regards,
Varun
↧
Re: How to hide UIBBs in MDG-M?
Hi Varun,
thanks for your idea. I read in guide 'Master Data Governance for Material: Performance Tweaks for MDG6.1 and later releases' that it's not recommended to use customizing and CBA simultaneously due to performance issues. Since we're using customizing, I would keep CBA in mind as a workaround if there were no other possibilities.
Best regards,
Hannes
↧