HI Swati,
I have change Attribute Property of attribute STKZN to "Not Defined",
I have selected dependent objects because i need to enable for Vendor process, SU_GeneraData
But I can not see "Natural person" attribute UIBB Config Path: BS_OVP_BP: BS_OVP_SP > OVP: BS_SP_OVP > Composite UIBB: BS_BP_DETAILS_CU > Form UIBB: BS_BP_DETAILS.
Please provide details.
Krishna.
Hello Kathehrine,
In following path what is number range for FERT (Internal or External) ?
Spro>Logistics-General>Material Master>Basic Settings>Material types>Define Number Ranges for each Material Type
Thanks
Kavita
Hi Kathrine
MDG always uses backend congiuration from ECC. In case of material it performs business validation for number range assigned to each material type which is defined in ECC Transaction code MMNR.
In your case it seems that there is external number assignment for FERT Material type.
Hope this helps you!
Sorted. Thanks. Full points.
Hello Shankar
Do you know how to resolve this issue?
Kiran
I don't agree that you "have" to use SOA. The above is very specific to MDG-F which has existing SOA services. To configure "Data Replication" using SOA, you need a SOA service in the first place. It is a possible solution (to create a SOA service and configure it). However, it might be a little over-kill for a co-deployed solution to do so.
Hi everyone,
I am using Manage UI configurations for MDG 7.0 SP5 and I am trying to copy an application configuration (BS_MAT_OVP_05) but I find that the Classification UIBB (WDC_MDG_BS_CLF_GEN) is unable to be selected as part of the deep copy. Does anyone know how to maintain this as part of the customer namespace copy of the application configuration?
I know that Abdullah Azzouni mentioned that this UIBB was built using native WDA embedded in FPM so its behavior might be different than other FPM-based UIBB's. Any insight into this issue or general workarounds would be much appreciated.
Yes, this UIBB is not controlled using FPM configuration. It can be embedded in an FPM application but its UI is native WDA.
Most probably you won't need to copy it. Rather, you should be able to enhance it using standard WDA enhancement methods. Should you really want to copy it, you should go to the WDA application in SE80 and copy it from there. Then, come back to the copied FPM configuration from above and replace the UIBB name.
I wouldn't recommend copying the classification WDA. Keep in mind, from the above the screenshot, you usually keep most UIBB's without copying them. Only copy those that need to be changed.
Locked due to the fact that this thread is more than one year old. In case of new questions, open a new thread.
Hi Sanjay,
the field is not part of the standard UI configuration since it is not really used anymore. If you need it, you can of course add it to the UI simply by customizing the desired UIBB.
Best regards
Michael
Hi,
as already mentioned by Ingo, this kind of change is considered as modification of the data model and should not be done. If you really need this, structure generation does not help. You need to modify affected structures (there are plenty of them!) manually, too.
Please keep in mind that with this modification you'll loose SAP support and might run into issues as soon as you plan to apply any newer MDG release or support package.
Best regards
Michael
Agree but for Flex custom data model either we have to Custom Idoc or SOA for data replication.
I also agree for reuse in co deployement mode it is taken care by access class and no extra effort is needed for data replication.
Is this correct?
Also can you tell me purpose of GenIl objects/BOL used specality for BP and API used only for MM. I already created thread for this
Diffreance between SPI for MM and GenIL for BP
What is meaning of field proprety as not defined in case of Hidden in GenIL objects?
Hi Michael
Thanks for confirmation!
Is addition is only sufficient in case of BP UIBB and not update is required for Not Defined Arrtribue in GenlL?
We are using code to determine which fields are available at certain points in our MDGM process.
The fields are hidden when they need to be BUT if there are no fields left in the UIBB, we need the UIBB itself to be hidden.
There is no way to do it via CBA as far as I know because the filter criteria available does not apply. So I plan to use CL_MDG_BS_MAT_APPCC->OVERRIDE_EVENT_OVP to hide the UIBBs by modifyng the table of UIBBs HOWEVER the table only has the UI config name and relative data. How can I determine if the UI config has no visible fields in it?
We have managed to achieve the results by implementing a secondary access class and custom interface.
Hi Benjamin
You can do it by setting display property as Hidden in UI configuration
I have managed to get around the issue by executing the checks on the custom field VARIANT FOR DESCRIPTION before it is used to derive the standard material description
Would this only hide it if there are no fields left in it after a dynamic hide at run time, and display it if there are fields present?
Additional Comment:
I've just tried flagging it as hidden in the UI config and the flag appears to do nothing on our system. Maybe due to our custom enhancements on the feeder classes etc. So I'm back to my original question of...how can I determine from a UIBB config name if it has any visible fields or not?
Message was edited by: Benjamin Allsopp
They are just two different techniques to be used with FPM. I am not sure why they used different techniques. Personally, I would have loved if all three MDG modules used the same technique. My guess is that three different teams worked on each and ended up building it slightly different. For GenIL, I believe that CRM uses that a lot. So, it might have made sense for that team to use whatever already exists. I believe it is the same for SPI.
Hi Experts,
I would like to know whether there would be any threat to ECC master data if one has the access to T-Codes XD01, XD02, XK01, XK02 in MDG system.
of course, i understand that any data changes made to master data in MDG via t- codes XD01,XD02,XK02, XK01, would get transferred to ECC.
Request you to let me know what would be the impact if one has the access to the above mentioned T-codes.
Thanks in advance