Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP Master Data Governance
Viewing all 5383 articles
Browse latest View live

Re-Processing of failed change requests MDG

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Data not flown to ECC whenever there is an error during replication of Vendors from MDG to ECC. The error message checked under MDS_PPO2.

 

I could see that there is option to re-process the change request in the transaction MDS_PP02, but nothing happens after completing the process.

 

Is there any way to re-process the failed change requests with modification or without modification of change request content?

 

 

 

 

Regards,

Hari.


Enhancing the MDG Analytics BI datasource

$
0
0

Folks,

 

I want to make a copy of BI Data source 0MDG_ANLY_CR_DATASOURCE and have the standard BI query 0MDG_CR_T01_Q0001 call the datasource. My requirement is to add a custom field to the data source, but structure MDG_ANLY_S_CR_DATASOURCE does not allow any enhancement to add new fields. Any help with this is appreciated.

 

Thanks,

Kartik.

Re: Global Message Container - Delete Message within the Feeder Class

$
0
0

Hi, I want to second Abdullah's comment. Removing a check error message from the message container is usually not a good approach. MDGM example: If Activation fails in reuse area and you modify the messages passed from the backend, MDG might think the activation was successful even though it wasn't.

To deactivate backend checks (or other checks), you can use MDG-IMG activity "Configure Properties of Change Request Step".

To modify mandatory field settings from the backend, MDGM provide transaction OMSR. Other applications have different settings.

So basically, it depends on your use case.

Regards, Ingo Bruß

extension of cutomer to US21 company code did not transfer to MDG Pod and ECC Prod

$
0
0

Hi experts,

 

We are facing a very high priority production problem where , the existing customer is extended for US21 company code  but it is not getting transferred to either MDG Production or ECC Production.

 

we also tried for other company code in quality system. we are facing the error : ' object  keys or type code missing ' in SLG1.

 

Please find the attached screen shots for your reference.

 

Request you to help in this regard.

 

 

Regards,

Reshma

Structure of MDM team

$
0
0

I work for a large FMCG business located across multiple manufacturing and office sites.

 

The business is on SAP - and has been for almost 2 years.

 

A change in structure might see centralisation and relocation of the MDM team - the data stewards. 

 

Is there an optimal model/structure for FMCG MDM teams? 

 

Does anyone have case studies or white papers that I can review?

 

Cheers

Jacqui

Re: Edition Valid to Issue

$
0
0

Hi Kiran

 

There are existing cost centers (1000+) in ECC with validity date 01012003 to 31122099.

I want to do intial upload for then in MDG.

How to do this as dont want to date as 31129999 as per edition?

I know we can create two editions with one with 31129999 load date first and again create new edition with valid from date 01012100 and load same data again. So that data lies in two valiodity periods one is 31122099 and second validity is 31129999. But I dont want second validity period at all . How to achieve this?

Re: Pre requiste to learn SAP MDG

$
0
0

Hi Manoj,

 

    Thanks for sharing the knowledge documents to all which you have.

    Could you please share the SAP MDG & BRF+ related documents to my id - thyagab@gmail.com

 

Thanks a lot,

Raj

Re: Global Message Container - Delete Message within the Feeder Class

$
0
0

Hi Abdul & Ingo,

 

thank you for your reply.

You are both right, I won't delete the messages from the container.

Currently I allocate the field within the feeder class with mo_entity->set_property method. So I will not get an error message.

 

@Abdul: I used BRF+ before, but I dont like this Framework, there makes some problems like transport and the usability is for me not the best. The cause might also be that I haven't enough experience knowledge.

 

@Ingo: Very useful tips, thanks!

 

Best regards,

Hasan


Re: Structure of MDM team

$
0
0

Hi Jacqui,

just a small comment on your question: from my experience there are two important - or almost mandatory - human factors if you want to be sucessful with an MDM projects and its related change management

1) get a sponsor for the project ideally on C-level

2) regardless of central / decentral team organization - make sure that the data ownership is not only well-defined but people are able to "live" it.

 

So looking at your ask, I am sure that there is no "optimal structure" in general (otherwise our customer would be smart enough to have that already in place) - the strcuture is individual per customer or could even differ per region or country.

 

In any case, I would also be interested if there are some case studies that discuss this questions and give some indication or pros and cons - maybe even specific for your industry.

 

Best regards,

Ingo

Re: Relevant role error while creating ERP Vendor in MDG

$
0
0

Hi Kiran,

 

I have maintained only FLVN00 - Business Partner FI Vendor (FS: BP) and removed other roles. I am now getting an error " Purchasing Org data are not allowed for role FI vendor" . I  should be able to create vendors across org levels(CoCode,Pur.Org) or without these Org levels. Please let me know if I  am using the correct Role.

 

 

Thanks,

 

Nagendra.

Re: Relevant role error while creating ERP Vendor in MDG

$
0
0

Try to create this vendor data using transaction BP for the same role. If it does not work there, it won't work in MDG.    

Re: Relevant role error while creating ERP Vendor in MDG

$
0
0

Hi

 

Please maintain the FLVN01 for vendor and FLCU01 for customer


Kiran

Read only attribute at RUN Time (ACCPLTYP-P&L Statement account type)

$
0
0


Hi

 

MDG attribute (ACCPLTYP-P&L Statement account type) is read only by default when we open the change request screen in MDG thorugh NWBC.

  1. In customization it seems that display type is input type.
  2. In configure properties of change request step also for every change request step field properties is Standard only.

 

Now as per SAP we can define mulitple accounts for P& L Statement Account type for  Profit and Loss account type in OB53 and can be used in GL account creation by selecting  P& L Statement Account type in FS00.

 

Now it works in ECC as this field is editable with input help, but in case of MDG as this field is read only we can not do selection.

So we want to convert to editable mode. How to achive this?

Re: Pitfalls of SAP MDG-C/MDG-S

$
0
0

Hello Nagendra

 

As such every system will have its own drawback. You can rephrase your words and ask the same question - What is the difference in SAP ECC Vs, MDG for Customer and supplier?

 

On to your queries -

 

1) Can we create a customer or Vendor in MDG without creating the Business partner.Similar to want we do in ECC(like tcode XD01,,) - Yes...Read the MDG documentation

 

2) Can we integrate a custom Fiori UI with MDG solution. - Yes.


Differences -


1. MDG data model and ECC table fields - you may find difference in the MDG fields and ECC. Based on the requirement you can extend MDG data model and add those fields.

2. Customer hierarchy - Currently not available in MDG. You have to assign the customer in ECC.

 

Hope it clarify your doubts. Read the SAP documentation for more details.

 

Kiran

Re: Read only attribute at RUN Time (ACCPLTYP-P&L Statement account type)

$
0
0

Additional information

 

When we press F4 for P& L Statement Account type to get input values which are defined under OB53 it gives dump saying that

 

ERROR: OVS: Method SET_OUTPUT_TABLE was not called (termination: RABAX_STATE) 


Re: Relevant role error while creating ERP Vendor in MDG

$
0
0

Nagendra,

Master Data Governance for Supplier->ERP Vendor UI (Alternative to the Supplier UI)->Configure CVI for ERP Vendor UI you will come to know whether your role is unique or not.

 

   Further check with you your Purchase or FICO tean which role they are using for the Vendor creation for PO.

regards

shanakar

Re: Pitfalls of SAP MDG-C/MDG-S

$
0
0

Hi Kiran,

 

Regarding the question of creating vendor without BP, is it possible for co-deployment system also. For hub system we can manage it using the ALE. It would be great if you could share the link of documentation relating to this query.

 

 

Thanks,

 

Nagendra.

Re: Pitfalls of SAP MDG-C/MDG-S

$
0
0

Hi Nagendra

 

1) Can we create a customer or Vendor in MDG without creating the Business partner.Similar to want we do in ECC(like tcode XD01,,).

 

Answer depends upon MDG deployement option either it is standalone or co deployment.

Though in both the cases BP are always created in MDG staging area if it is standalone then while replicating you can replicate only Vendor/Customer to target system and it replication of BP is option.

But in case of co deployement option BP along with Vendor/Customer are automatically replicated.

 

There are two UI's delivered by SAP Vender/Customer Like UI and Supplier UI.

So if it want to see screen like  XD01/XK01 then go with Vender/Customer Like UI and if want to see screen like N\BP transaction coe then go with Supplier UI.

 

 

2) Can we integrate a custom Fiori UI with MDG solution. - Yes.

Re: Pitfalls of SAP MDG-C/MDG-S

$
0
0

Hi Nagendra

 

It is not possible to create vendor/customer without BP as BP is base layer used in MDG and Vendor/Customer are ECC specific and can be achived with  CVI customization.

In Co deployement as explained earlier no ALE required and replication is done automatically via access class, But in case of hub system you can replicate only vendor/customer to target ECC system using releveant message mesaage and thus you can skip BP replication in trget ECC

Re: BOM creation and report generation of BOM structure in SAP MDG

$
0
0

Dear Nithila,

Currently there is no standard funcationality available in MDG to create the BOM,you can create Custom data model for BOM creation.

regards

shankar

Viewing all 5383 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>