Hi Michael
Thank you for confirmation!
Hi Michael
Thank you for confirmation!
Hi,
I have a requirement to disable for editing the fields in Translation tab of Cost Center. If I try to implement the logic using: USMD_UI_EVENT2 it is not working and Cost Center Description fields becoming editable. Can you please let me know if we have any other BAdi or any otherway to achieve this?
Thanks,
Sekhar
With FPM (or web dynpro in general), users can right-click the field; go to user data and then select "set value as default". However, this personalization is done on a personal level and is not a parameter that you store in the user master.
Is disabling these fields needed for all or conditional? If for all, why not just remove them from the screen? You can customize your FPM application to remove unnecessary fields from different UIBB's.
Hi Abdullah
But our requirment is not to defaul COAREA maually but it shpuld come with role
If the field is open for users to enter the value, then, I recommend educating them to do it themselves.
If users will not be able to maintain that value, then, you can enhance your feeder class to read the user parameter and default the value into the field in the GET_DATA method. However, if the field is open for users to change the value, I would question the added value of this solution vs. actually educating users to set defaults for themselves. Remember, they only have to do it once (setting the default that is).
Hi Abdullah
For your confirmation! I will try with my client
Hi all!
We are working with MDG-FI, and we have a problem with the Account input field when creating a change request of type OG_SR_01 / OG_SR_02. The matchcode of this field doesn`t work fine and the accounts that exist in the SAP ECC FI transactions don´t appear here:
If I type the account number manually, the system triggers this error: Account BANK/1000 does not exist
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Roberto
Hi, did you already activate the data model again and re-generate the generated structures?
I believe your change might lead to inconsistencies in the data model itself (like defining a unit for the QUAN fields), which need to be rectified up front.
Regards, Ingo Bruß
This is as I feared.
We will have to make it a reuse then!
Thank you for confirming.
Hi,
But the MDG is installed like an add-on in SAP ECC system, not like a hub...
Regards,
Roberto
Hi,
So I have to load the accounts even if the MDG is installed like an add-on into the same system, not in hub?
I have downloaded the accounts with the MDMGX transaction, what's the way to load the information into MDG?
Thanks!
Roberto
Hello Roberto
Yes. Since MDG-F is flex model, it has its own tables. The data is get updated first in the MDG tables and then in ECC.
You can use MDMGX to load the entire data in MDG.
Kiran
Hi
1. No its not required to activate hub related service. Only activate client services.
2. Please check whether you have activated supplier related business functions as well.
If still you can't activate BP data model then you have to activate few business sets in MDG. I will share the list later. First try and activate supplier business function.
Kiran
Hi
Can it possible to replace valid from date for every controlling object like cost center with created date stored in MDG after replication?
My requirement is to create cost center with created date and valid from date same, not as per edition.
Hello Sanjay
In ECC its possible but in MDG its not feasible without Edition. You can create daily edition and release it. That is the only option.
May be it can be feasible in MDG 8 but not sure.
Kiran
Hi Kiran
Can it possible to create on fly edition for every change request?
Hello Sanjay
I think you have you create the edition first and then CR...
Kiran...
Hi Kiran,
Thanks for your response.
With MDMGX transaction I could export the data into xml files but, how can I load it in MDG?
Regards,
Roberto
Hi
We are using MDG 7 FP02 and doing hierarchy replication with idoc in out target client system,
But it seems the hierarchy values are different in KE53 from KCH3.
The value for hierarchy area in KE53 is top node assigned to controlling area which is assigned during single processing.
When we perform hiearchy assignment throgh multiple object processing in MDH we can see correct value of hiearchy node in KCH3 but in display transaction it still remains as top node. Any reason why this not updated automatically for hierarchy area?