I looked at KUNNR field in below mappings. I could not see a field KUNNR to be mapped to.
SUPPL_BP_VENGEN_2STA
SUPPL_BP_VENGEN_2API
Thanks,
Ramesh
↧
Re: KUNNR field in Supplier UI
↧
Re: KUNNR field in Supplier UI
Did you add the field to the data model? Since this field does not exist in the data model, you need to add it there first. It will have to be something like ZKUNNR. Then, you need to generate the new structures in which ZKUNNR will be added as a custom include field. After that ZKUNNR will show up when you are extending the SMT mapping. In SMT mapping, you need to map ZKUNNR of the generated structure to standard field KUNNR of structure VMDS_EI_VMD_CENTRAL_DATA. KUNNR is definitely there. The mapping has to be done for both the *_2STA and *_2API SMT mappings.
This is really straightforward from the "how-to guide". The only difference here is that KUNNR is explicitly hidden in the GenIL model and that you needed to "unhide" it.
↧
↧
Re: KUNNR field in Supplier UI
Here is the Background.
I do have an attribute called ZZKUNNR in data model. I followed steps in Guide and completed all the mapping. But then ZZKUNNR was not available in FPM to add in UI. Then I got input from you to look at in genIL_model_browser. I found KUNNR field and changed property to 'Not Defined'. Then field started to show up in FPM and the field was added in UI. But customer value is not flowing to ECC.
My confusion is: KUNNR was enabled in genIL. But we have an attribute called ZZKUNNR which is mapped to KUNNR of VMDS_EI_VMD_CENTRAL_DATA. I have done the mapping for XFLAG as well.
I am seeing disconnect between ZZKUNNR and KUNNR which was enabled in genIL. Am I missing anything else?
↧
Re: KUNNR field in Supplier UI
FPM looks at the GenIL model (KUNNR). MDG looks at the data model (ZZKUNNR). You need to map both using SMT extension.
↧
Re: Issue Adding standard field from LFA1 to MDG UI - Vendor General Data
Hi Abdullah
Any specific purpose to make std LFA1 field as Hidden in GennL?
↧
↧
Unable to locate Arrtribute PCTRCCTR in 0G data model for entity type CCTR
Hi
I am Unable to locate Arrtribute PCTRCCTR in 0G data model for entity type CCTR.
As per Metadata by SAP it says complex OVS. Not understanding meaning for this also
Also domain element USMDZ1_PCTR is assigned to PCTRCCTR. But for domain element no input help is assigned.So earger to know how UI shows arrtribute with F4 help
↧
Re: KUNNR field in Supplier UI
Did you modify the GenIL enhancement BUPA_CUSP directly? You should not do that. Instead, you should create an enhancement to the enhancement and modify the properties there.
Any way, your screenshots seem to be correct. My advise is to go over the how-to guide very carefully and follow it to the letter. You might find that you missed something here or there or maybe misspelled something.
↧
Re: Mandatory fields issue in Update Supplier Change Request
Did you "synch" those migrated vendors and their BP records? If not, you will need to do that so each vendor has a proper BP record.
↧
Re: KUNNR field in Supplier UI
I am doing this in Sandbox for POC so I did not care about enhancement.
I am using below document for the reference. Let me look over one more time.
SAP How-To Guide: Extend MDG-S Data Model by a New Field (Reuse Option)
↧
↧
How to drive the UI field values to Brf table
Hello Experts,
I have 4 fields in UI where 2 are conditional field ( Those 2 fields values are not going to database table) and other 2 fields values goes to database table.
Q1. In the above case how to drive the value from UI field to Brf table?
↧
Re: MDG new entity type and deep-copy configuration
Hi,
I've resolved whit wiring.
Thanks!
↧
Re: Change request created through program
Hi,
I have developed a report to test the creation of CR using the MDG Convenience API and I get the same behaviour.
When I follow the link the search page UI is shown instead of the CR UI:
The attached file called "Z_TEST_MDG_CONV_API" has the report that I use to create de CR. Do you have some tips to create and display the CR succesfully?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Jordi
↧
MDG Purchasing organization
Hi,
I havea problem when create a new supplier in MDG 7. I 've created a new supplier with fuction BBP000 and a company code, but when I added purchasing organizations, to display the error missage:
Fill vendor number, personnel number, or contact person number
The company code and purchasing organizations are well related. I tried to create the change request selected other fuctions (FLNV01 or FLNV00), but the message appear.
Thanks!
↧
↧
MDG Purchasing organization
Hi,
I havea problem when create a new supplier in MDG 7. I 've created a new supplier with fuction BBP000 and a company code, but when I added purchasing organizations, to display the error missage:
Fill vendor number, personnel number, or contact person number
The company code and purchasing organizations are well related. I tried to create the change request selected other fuctions (FLNV01 or FLNV00), but the message appear.
Thanks!
↧
Re: Mandatory fields issue in Update Supplier Change Request
Hi Abdullah,
By "synch" you mean CVI- Customer/Vendor Integration ?
For all the migrated vendors, BP records are created by using CVI settings in the direction vendor to Business Partner. This is done and this include below given settings (done for all relevant account groups).
1. BP Numbering range from internal to external
2. vendor Numbering range from external to internal
3. Same Number marked in Number assignment for direction Vendor to BP
4. Same Number unmarked in Number assignment for direction BP to Vendor
Please let me know if I have missed something (by the way I am able to view the migrated records completely in MDG UI).
Thanks & Regards,
Swati Verma
↧
Generate Report/Extract from BRF+
Hello Experts,
I want to know that how can we Generate Report/Extract from BRF+ ??
I have created Validation and Derivation Rules in BRF+, and now I want to Export them all in a file (text or excel) . Is this feature available? How can I achieve this ?
I see that there is Export XML and Import XML tools available in BRF+, but it do not extract validation rules.
↧
Re: Mandatory fields issue in Update Supplier Change Request
Hi Swati,
Can you please check if there are any BRF+ validations restricting those values, did you try with other records/values.
Regards,
Charan.
↧
↧
Re: Change request created through program
Hi,
as Arthur said on a previous post, you must create a GUID and complete the BP_HEADER-BP_GUID field.
You can use the GUID_CREATE function module (obsolete) or the cl_system_uuid=>create_uuid_x16_static( ) method.
Best Regards,
Jordi.
↧
Re: Workflow step generating IDOC for Workflow# WS60800086
Thanks Abdullah,
In our scenario,after we approve the change request using MDG an idoc gets generated.
So if there is no workflow step generating an idoc.
Is there any other configurations in MDG for generating the idoc
↧
Re: Workflow step generating IDOC for Workflow# WS60800086
No, there is not. Please read my reply again. Approving the MDG request will activate the record (meaning that the DB record is updated). Updating the application (whether it is through MDG or through a regular transaction) will trigger the IDOC. So, the IDOC is not directly controlled from MDG workflow.
↧
